While stochastic differential equations with jumps are continuous-time and continuous-state, they are not quite what you’d imagine as a continuous process

Can we construct a process with independent and stationary increments that does not have state-dependent coefficients?

Definition

We start with assumptions about how this model should work,

  • and for are independent
  • The distribution of depends only on
  • is a continuous function of

These assumptions happen to uniquely describe the process, up to a scaling constant

What’s the distribution of ? Let’s start with ,
for any , i.e. is the sum of i.i.d. random variables

These increments are also small, meaning as

Therefore, is normal

A Brownian motion or a Weiner process with variance parameter is a stochastic process taking values in the real numbers satisfying,

  1. ;
  2. For any , the variables are independent;
  3. For any , the random variable has a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance ;
  4. The paths are continuous, i.e., the function is a continuous function of

We include the normal distribution requirement, even though it follows naturally from the definition

Standard Brownian motion has
We can also speak of a Brownian motion with

We can look at this motion as a limit of random walks

Suppose is an unbiased random walk on the integers
where

We look at time increments of and set ( normalizes )), so the size of the jump in is

We consider the discrete approximation as a process for all values of (not just intervals of ) by linear interpolation, and as , the discrete approximation approaches a continuous process which is Brownian motion (the details of this limit are not important here)

approaches a standard normal by CLT and approaches a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance

, meaning the typical size of an increment is about

does not exist, since is much larger than for small values

The path of a Brownian motion is nowhere differentiable

This is strangely non-trivial to prove
Consider the following two statements,

  • for all

The first statement is true, but the second statement is false! and likely some , in which case there is a point that crosses over

We cannot simply take the union of an uncountable set

As an illustrative example, consider

Markov Property

Let represent the information contained in

Rewritten,
This is the Markov property of Brownian motion, that we can predict given all the information up through time with just the value of the Brownian motion at time

The general form of the Markov property is for

For Brownian motion, this follows from a stronger property, that is a Brownian motion independent of , i.e. is a Brownian motion starting at

, since is
This satisfies Chapman-Kolmogorov, written in the continuous form as

We want a stronger guarantee than the Markov property

A random variable is a stopping time for Brownian motion if is measurable with respect to
We mainly consider

represents the information contained up through a stopping time
is the process beyond time

Strong Markov Property: is a Brownian motion independent of

This is more powerful because it states independence from a non-fixed time (a random variable)

Example: Calculate the probability that there is some where

Let be the first time the Brownian motion equals 1

so

This step uses the Strong Markov property,
, so

Reflection Principle: Suppose is a Brownian motion with starting at and . Then for any ,

Example:

Suppose
The probability for some is the same as the probability for some , which by symmetry is the same as the probability for some

We average over all values of ,

We can ultimately solve this with some substitutions, leading to

Scaling Properties

Consider
This is an interesting “fractal” of the real line

Scaling Properties: Suppose is a standard Brownian motion,

  1. is a standard Brownian motion, for
  2. is a standard Brownian motion

We showed before which approaches 1 as
Along with the strong Markov property, this show that the Brownian motion returns to the origin infinite times

What happens near ? Our second scaling property implies that also returns to the origin infinite times near the origin

has many interesting properties,

  • It is closed, i.e. and implies (from continuity)
  • 0 is not an isolated point, i.e. there are positive numbers such that (in fact no points are isolated)
  • looks like the Cantor set

What is the dimension of ?
Both Hausdorff dimensions and box dimensions can give rise to fractional dimensions, which are often referred to as fractal dimensions (we talk about box dimension)

Suppose we have a bounded set in and we need to cover with -dimensional balls with diameter … How many balls will it take? A line segment will take balls, a square , and a standard -dimensional set will take balls

Thus, the box dimension of a set is the number such that for small the number of balls of diameter needed to cover is on the order of

Example:
Consider the Cantor set , obtained by recursively removing the middle third of each interval

We can cover with intervals of length

How do we apply this to ? Let’s cover with intervals of diameter

We will consider the intervals ,
A particular interval is needed if

Assume , is a standard Brownian motion

So
This example solved the required probability, so we see



For large ,
Hence,

So it takes on the order of intervals of length to cover

Brownian Motion in Several Dimensions

Suppose are independent one-dimensional standard Brownian motions, then we call a standard -dimensional Brownian motion

This satisfies the following,

  • For any , the vector-valued random variables are independent
  • The random variable has a joint normal distribution with mean 0 and covariance matrix , i.e. joint density
  • is a continuous function of

is the probability density of assuming

This still satisfies Chapman-Kolmogorov,

Brownian motion is related to the theory of diffusion
Suppose that a large number of particles are distributed in according to density and let denote the density at time , such that

If a particle starts at position , the probability density for its position at time is
Integrating gives

Symmetry tells us

Assuming , this is the expected value of , which we denote as

We’d like to derive a differential equation for
Consider with
The Taylor series for a function is , where is an error term such that as



and
So we get
The same thing works for all , so
Generalizing , where is the Laplacian

This is known as the heat equation

Brownian motion with variance parameter yields with the diffusion constant

Consider a bounded region with boundary with initial heat distribution and fixed temperature
If denotes the temperature at at time , then satisfies

We can write this in terms of Brownian motion,
Let be a -dimensional Brownian motion with , and let ,

As , we reach a steady-state distribution ,

Example:
Let , with such that , and take

Consider where is a standard Brownian motion

Let be the function on where and

for


We can extrapolate recurrence in one dimension from this,

, i.e. always returns to

Recurrence and Transience

Suppose is a standard -dimensional Brownian motion and let be the annulus with

Let be the probability that a standard Brownian motion starting at hits the sphere defined by before


where

To start, we have,
, and for and for

Due to symmetry, we can also write for some
Written in spherical coordinates,


We use our boundary conditions to obtain,
, for
, for

Given this equation, what’s the probability that Brownian motion never returns to the disc of radius ?

So for discs with positive radius, Brownian motion is recurrent, but can Brownian motion return to exactly ?

No, Brownian motion in two dimensions is neighborhood recurrent but not point recurrent

For ,

So Brownian motion with is transient

Fractal Nature

We already talked about the fractal nature of the zero-set of Brownian motion, but there is more to say about fractals

Let with
We can bound the set

How many balls of diameter do we need to cover ?

For , consider the ball of radius , which needs on order of to be covered. By our argument in the previous section, the Brownian motion will visit all open balls hence we need all and the box dimension of is

For , the probability a ball with diameter around a point is visiting is which is about a constant times (considering the scaling in terms of ), thus the total number of balls needed is

We conclude the path of a -dimensional Brownian motion has fractal dimension two

Closely related to the fractal nature of Brownian motion is the scaling rule listed earlier, if is a standard one-dimensional Brownian motion and , then is also a standard Brownian motion

We examine whether there is some process by which has the same distribution as for , i.e. whether there are possible alternative scaling rules

If has finite variance then
, implying

Let
If the paths have jumps then ought not to go to zero as , however they should still be limited at some point



The book implies we can extrapolate from this that is a good candidate

If then this has a finite variance and therefore
For , there are examples called symmetric stable distributions, with corresponding processes called symmetric stable processes

These densities can only be given explicitly for , which is the Cauchy distribution with

Brownian Motion with Drift

Consider a -dimensional Brownian motion with variance parameter starting at , let and

We call a -dimensional Brownian motion with drift and variance parameter starting at

satisfies,

  1. Disjoint increments are independent
  2. has a normal distribution with mean and covariance matrix
  3. is a continuous function of

The motion of is essentially a “straight line” with fluctuations, i.e.

which satisfies the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation

Considering , , we write in a Taylor series about ,




Compared to the earlier calculations without drift, the addition of drift added a first derivative

In dimensions,