While stochastic differential equations with jumps are continuous-time and continuous-state, they are not quite what you’d imagine as a continuous process
Can we construct a process with independent and stationary increments that does not have state-dependent coefficients?
Definition
We start with assumptions about how this model should work,
- and for are independent
- The distribution of depends only on
- is a continuous function of
These assumptions happen to uniquely describe the process, up to a scaling constant
What’s the distribution of ? Let’s start with ,
for any , i.e. is the sum of i.i.d. random variables
These increments are also small, meaning as
Therefore, is normal
A Brownian motion or a Weiner process with variance parameter is a stochastic process taking values in the real numbers satisfying,
- ;
- For any , the variables are independent;
- For any , the random variable has a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance ;
- The paths are continuous, i.e., the function is a continuous function of
We include the normal distribution requirement, even though it follows naturally from the definition
Standard Brownian motion has
We can also speak of a Brownian motion with
We can look at this motion as a limit of random walks
Suppose is an unbiased random walk on the integers
where
We look at time increments of and set ( normalizes )), so the size of the jump in is
We consider the discrete approximation as a process for all values of (not just intervals of ) by linear interpolation, and as , the discrete approximation approaches a continuous process which is Brownian motion (the details of this limit are not important here)
approaches a standard normal by CLT and approaches a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance
, meaning the typical size of an increment is about
does not exist, since is much larger than for small values
The path of a Brownian motion is nowhere differentiable
This is strangely non-trivial to prove
Consider the following two statements,
- for all
The first statement is true, but the second statement is false! and likely some , in which case there is a point that crosses over
We cannot simply take the union of an uncountable set
As an illustrative example, consider
Markov Property
Let represent the information contained in
Rewritten,
This is the Markov property of Brownian motion, that we can predict given all the information up through time with just the value of the Brownian motion at time
The general form of the Markov property is for
For Brownian motion, this follows from a stronger property, that is a Brownian motion independent of , i.e. is a Brownian motion starting at
, since is
This satisfies Chapman-Kolmogorov, written in the continuous form as
We want a stronger guarantee than the Markov property
A random variable is a stopping time for Brownian motion if is measurable with respect to
We mainly consider
represents the information contained up through a stopping time
is the process beyond time
Strong Markov Property: is a Brownian motion independent of
This is more powerful because it states independence from a non-fixed time (a random variable)
Example: Calculate the probability that there is some where
Let be the first time the Brownian motion equals 1
so
This step uses the Strong Markov property,
, so
Reflection Principle: Suppose is a Brownian motion with starting at and . Then for any ,
Example:
Suppose
The probability for some is the same as the probability for some , which by symmetry is the same as the probability for some
We average over all values of ,
We can ultimately solve this with some substitutions, leading to
Scaling Properties
Consider
This is an interesting “fractal” of the real line
Scaling Properties: Suppose is a standard Brownian motion,
- is a standard Brownian motion, for
- is a standard Brownian motion
We showed before which approaches 1 as
Along with the strong Markov property, this show that the Brownian motion returns to the origin infinite times
What happens near ? Our second scaling property implies that also returns to the origin infinite times near the origin
has many interesting properties,
- It is closed, i.e. and implies (from continuity)
- 0 is not an isolated point, i.e. there are positive numbers such that (in fact no points are isolated)
- looks like the Cantor set
What is the dimension of ?
Both Hausdorff dimensions and box dimensions can give rise to fractional dimensions, which are often referred to as fractal dimensions (we talk about box dimension)
Suppose we have a bounded set in and we need to cover with -dimensional balls with diameter … How many balls will it take? A line segment will take balls, a square , and a standard -dimensional set will take balls
Thus, the box dimension of a set is the number such that for small the number of balls of diameter needed to cover is on the order of
Example:
Consider the Cantor set , obtained by recursively removing the middle third of each interval
We can cover with intervals of length
How do we apply this to ? Let’s cover with intervals of diameter
We will consider the intervals ,
A particular interval is needed if
Assume , is a standard Brownian motion
So
This example solved the required probability, so we see
For large ,
Hence,
So it takes on the order of intervals of length to cover
Brownian Motion in Several Dimensions
Suppose are independent one-dimensional standard Brownian motions, then we call a standard -dimensional Brownian motion
This satisfies the following,
- For any , the vector-valued random variables are independent
- The random variable has a joint normal distribution with mean 0 and covariance matrix , i.e. joint density
- is a continuous function of
is the probability density of assuming
This still satisfies Chapman-Kolmogorov,
Brownian motion is related to the theory of diffusion
Suppose that a large number of particles are distributed in according to density and let denote the density at time , such that
If a particle starts at position , the probability density for its position at time is
Integrating gives
Symmetry tells us
Assuming , this is the expected value of , which we denote as
We’d like to derive a differential equation for
Consider with
The Taylor series for a function is , where is an error term such that as
and
So we get
The same thing works for all , so
Generalizing , where is the Laplacian
This is known as the heat equation
Brownian motion with variance parameter yields with the diffusion constant
Consider a bounded region with boundary with initial heat distribution and fixed temperature
If denotes the temperature at at time , then satisfies
We can write this in terms of Brownian motion,
Let be a -dimensional Brownian motion with , and let ,
As , we reach a steady-state distribution ,
Example:
Let , with such that , and take
Consider where is a standard Brownian motion
Let be the function on where and
for
We can extrapolate recurrence in one dimension from this,
, i.e. always returns to
Recurrence and Transience
Suppose is a standard -dimensional Brownian motion and let be the annulus with
Let be the probability that a standard Brownian motion starting at hits the sphere defined by before
where
To start, we have,
, and for and for
Due to symmetry, we can also write for some
Written in spherical coordinates,
We use our boundary conditions to obtain,
, for
, for
Given this equation, what’s the probability that Brownian motion never returns to the disc of radius ?
So for discs with positive radius, Brownian motion is recurrent, but can Brownian motion return to exactly ?
No, Brownian motion in two dimensions is neighborhood recurrent but not point recurrent
For ,
So Brownian motion with is transient
Fractal Nature
We already talked about the fractal nature of the zero-set of Brownian motion, but there is more to say about fractals
Let with
We can bound the set
How many balls of diameter do we need to cover ?
For , consider the ball of radius , which needs on order of to be covered. By our argument in the previous section, the Brownian motion will visit all open balls hence we need all and the box dimension of is
For , the probability a ball with diameter around a point is visiting is which is about a constant times (considering the scaling in terms of ), thus the total number of balls needed is
We conclude the path of a -dimensional Brownian motion has fractal dimension two
Closely related to the fractal nature of Brownian motion is the scaling rule listed earlier, if is a standard one-dimensional Brownian motion and , then is also a standard Brownian motion
We examine whether there is some process by which has the same distribution as for , i.e. whether there are possible alternative scaling rules
If has finite variance then
, implying
Let
If the paths have jumps then ought not to go to zero as , however they should still be limited at some point
The book implies we can extrapolate from this that is a good candidate
If then this has a finite variance and therefore
For , there are examples called symmetric stable distributions, with corresponding processes called symmetric stable processes
These densities can only be given explicitly for , which is the Cauchy distribution with
Brownian Motion with Drift
Consider a -dimensional Brownian motion with variance parameter starting at , let and
We call a -dimensional Brownian motion with drift and variance parameter starting at
satisfies,
- Disjoint increments are independent
- has a normal distribution with mean and covariance matrix
- is a continuous function of
The motion of is essentially a “straight line” with fluctuations, i.e.
which satisfies the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation
Considering , , we write in a Taylor series about ,
Compared to the earlier calculations without drift, the addition of drift added a first derivative
In dimensions,