See Continuous-Time Discrete-State Processes and Countable Markov Chains for more background context
Birth and Death
We assign birth rates and death rates
is determined by solving the system with ,
Example:
Queueing models are represented easily
- One server: ,
- servers: ,
- Infinite servers: ,
Population model (with immigration): ,
This chain is clearly irreducible. We check if it is recurrent by examining the corresponding discrete-time chain
,
As in Countable Markov Chains, define as the probability a chain starting at reaches
,
,
(we say the term is )
This means the birth and death chain is transient
Like before, not all recurrent chains have limiting probabilities
An irreducible chain is positive recurrent if there is some distribution for all , other a chain is null recurrent
If the system is in the limiting probability, and
We solve for
This can only be a probability measure if , such that
Example:
For a one server queue,
This is positive recurrent for , in which case the equilibrium distribution is
The expected length of the queue is
We find that a server queue is positive recurrent if
For the infinite server queue, we get which is positive recurrent for all with , the Poisson distribution with
Example:
The Yule process is a pure birth process with
,
We can derive for
This looks like a geometric distribution with parameter , so we know that
Another way to see this: Consider the time when the population first reaches . , where is an exponential variable with parameter
It follows and , so equals up to a small random, bounded error. If it takes time to reach individuals, then in time we expect individuals
Example:
Consider
Amazingly, this means the population grows to an infinite size in finite time! This is often called explosion
General Continuous, Countable Chains
Suppose we have a countable state space and rates
If we have
First assume that explosion does not occur. We derive differential equations with Chapman-Kolmogorov,
Forward equations:
Backward equations:
The forward equations usually are justified, but sometimes the backwards equations are necessary
As we’ve seen, the case of finite state can be solved as